An audit typically examines which of the following aspects regarding documentation?

An audit in a medical setting is fundamentally concerned with ensuring that documentation meets specific standards of quality and completeness. Quality refers to the accuracy, clarity, and relevance of the medical records, while completeness means that all necessary information is included to support the patient's diagnosis and treatment. This aspect is vital as it directly impacts patient care, billing, and compliance with regulations.

Ensuring quality and completeness not only helps in assessing the clinical documentation improvement but also aids in auditing for coding accuracy. This can lead to appropriate reimbursement and reduction of potential legal issues related to inadequate documentation. Therefore, this focus aligns with the best practices in medical auditing.

In contrast, examining solely the quantity of performed procedures would not necessarily reflect the quality of care or the appropriateness of the documentation. Patient feedback, while informative, does not provide a comprehensive overview of documentation protocols or compliance from a regulatory standpoint. Lastly, limiting the audit to financial details fails to capture the broader context of clinical documentation, which includes patient care and treatment outcomes, thus missing a critical aspect of medical audits.