What is a drawback of using an electronic audit tool?

Choosing the option regarding prioritizing documentation over medical necessity highlights an important concern in the use of electronic audit tools. While electronic tools can streamline the auditing process and enhance efficiency, one significant drawback can be their tendency to emphasize the completeness of documentation rather than ensuring that the services billed meet medical necessity criteria.

This means that auditors may focus on whether the required paperwork is present and correctly formatted, potentially overlooking the critical aspect of whether the services provided were actually necessary for the patient's condition. This could lead to audits that are more about checking boxes and less about evaluating the appropriateness of the care provided, which is essential for compliance and quality patient care.

In contrast, the other concerns, such as costs, user-friendliness, and the need for internet connectivity, while valid points, do not directly relate to the core function and intended outcome of the auditing process — ensuring both compliance and the delivery of appropriate medical services. Prioritizing documentation over medical necessity can undermine the overall effectiveness of the audit and the integrity of care provided.