What often occurs after an audit identifies a specific error or cause of error?

After an audit identifies a specific error or cause of error, it is common practice to conduct a closer examination of this issue in subsequent audits. This is because recognizing an area where errors have occurred provides valuable insights that can help prevent similar issues in the future. By focusing on these specific findings, auditors can implement targeted strategies for improvement and ensure that the same mistakes are not repeated.

This approach is essential for the ongoing enhancement of auditing processes and to uphold compliance standards. Continual monitoring and evaluation of previously identified issues foster a culture of accountability and quality improvement within the organization. It's a proactive step that helps to address root causes rather than simply responding to issues as they arise.

The other options, while potentially relevant in different contexts, do not align as closely with the typical follow-up actions taken after identifying a specific error during an audit. For example, terminating personnel or making blanket policy revisions might be considered more extreme responses and are not necessarily immediate actions taken in response to audit findings. Reviewing previous audits could occur, but it is not as specific to the identified error as focusing on that issue in future audits. Thus, the approach highlighted in the chosen answer represents a strategic and effective method of maintaining high audit standards.