Which activity should the IRO avoid?

The implementation of any corrective action is an activity that the Independent Review Organization (IRO) should avoid. This principle is grounded in the IRO's role as an objective third party that conducts audits to evaluate compliance and quality of care without influencing the process or outcomes. If an IRO were to implement corrective actions, it could create a conflict of interest, as their objectivity would be compromised. Their primary responsibility is to provide an unbiased assessment of medical practices, ensuring that any identified issues are noted without direct involvement in remediation or corrective measures.

In contrast, conducting interviews, collecting data, and preparing reports are integral parts of the IRO’s auditing process. These activities allow the IRO to gather necessary information, assess compliance, and provide informed recommendations based on their findings, maintaining the integrity of their assessment role.